Monday 30 November 2015

Production Update



Following our feedback we have been changing certain aspects of our product; we have added another voice over to introduce our documentary, I have also cut out a section in the clip where we put head torches on as we didn't like how it sounded, and I have made the transition over the screams at the end a bit smoother.

Friday 20 November 2015

Production Update


After receiving feedback on our first cut, we have gone back to start using this feedback to improve our product. We have changed the transition between the talking heads as we didn't like how it looked. We have also re-done the censoring, sped up the waiting scene. We also cut parts out and changed the location of some shots as we felt it was too long, and rushed as we tried to get a lot of content into a short time.

So far for our final cut I think that we have managed to improve the quality of our work.

Monday 16 November 2015

Non-Corporal Entity Association First Cut with Feedback


Holding Shots Steady
- Hand held shots fit the style of the documentary
- Some shots are too shaky
- Only steady when it's meant to be
- Intentional shaky camera, some shots are shaky though

Framing of Shots
- Group shots framed very well, could have more individual focus through-out the house
- When shaky camera wasn't used, use of shots was decent

Appropriate Material for Task
- Clear conventions used for the style
- Smiling too much

Selecting Mise En Scene
- Clear use of props and setting to create an atmosphere
- Lighting and contrast needs to be adjusted
- Effective low-key lighting, but sometimes too low-key
- Lighting too dark

Editing for Meaning
- Could be developed by ensuring shots are structured to fit the tone
- Smiling/laughing
- Good use of contrast to create supernatural effect

Varied Shots Transitions and Post Production Effects
- After effects (night vision) needs to be added
- Censoring needs to be fixed as it doesn't cover the words, fast forward needs to be added

Use of Sounds
- Sound needs to be consistent across the piece
- Very loud, clipping, laughing
- Add in another voice over
- Effective music
- Censoring wasn't very good

Use of Titles
- Some unfinished, a clearer title sequence could be added
- No introduction voice over
- Good Channel 4 clip

Overall Comment
- Some high quality footage has been produced and a level 4 can be achieved with the addition of more work
- Could use more voice, and some shots can be sped up and shortened. But overall very good.

Monday 9 November 2015

Target Audience

Age: Teenagers (12+)

12+ is the most suitable age because the documentary is based on ghosts which people of all ages, but specifically teenagers may be interested in; teens are the main audience as they may relate to the characters better due to them being a similar age. I think that it isn't scary enough to classify it as a 15, it does contain some strong language, however this is censored. Sometimes documentaries on the supernatural can use quite complicated terminology, but all dialogue is simple enough for it to be understood by 12 year olds. This may interest all ages because ghost stories and films have been around for long enough that they have gained a large audience, meaning our documentary would likely be successful.

Gender: All


Our documentary isn't aimed at any specific gender, however it has more females in the cast which could be argued to attract more males to the audience. The story doesn't follow any specific character and is about the whole group, so this is why it is aimed at no specific gender.


Social Class/Social Group:

There is no specific social class, but the social group would be those generally interested in the supernatural as this is the documentary's focus. The social group watching this would be watching this later in the evening (for example, around 9pm) as this is a peak time for watching TV, it is also the time that documentaries in this genre are typically aired.

Ethnicity: No specific ethnicity

We created this documentary with no specific ethnicity in mind, so it is aimed at any ethnicity.

Demographics: C1, C2, D, E

C1/C2 = Lower middle class/skilled working class: supervisory or clerical, junior managerial, administrative or professional, skilled manual workers. I think this class would fall in our target audience because these workers have time to watch this documentary and may be in the target social group.

D = Working class: semi and unskilled manual workers. This class may because this class would have more time to watch this documentary as they may not have to work in the later evenings, and they may be in our target social group.

E = Casual/lowest grade workers: state pensioners or widows, those at lowest level of subsistence. This class may be our main target audience as they have the most time to sit and watch this documentary, and this is the class that our characters fall into; they are just students that are trying to become famous using this documentary. This audience may be able to relate better to the characters.

Psycho-dynamics

The main psycho-dynamic would be the spectators. This is because they are watching the documentary due to their interest in the matter, which is our main target audience. The second psycho-dynamic would be the joiners because they are the people who aspire to be like the characters in the documentary and it may peak some viewers interests to go on investigations of their own with some friends. They are also people who join through social networking sites where the 'team'  would be posting their latest adventures.

Wednesday 4 November 2015

Production Update


We have now completed filming all scenes, and are currently editing the new scenes into our first cut.